Advice to President Trump Pertaining to FEMA
The advice below originally ran December 16. Unfortunately, the FEMA situation in North Carolina has only continued to deteriorate.
Yesterday, the President said he was considering reforming or even eliminating FEMA. I don't think too many would be sad to see it go given its utter incompetence. However, there may be a mission for a greatly slimmed down FEMA. I outline what that mission below.
Unfortunately, I do not have a way to get this message to President Trump. If anyone knows the right person, please feel free to forward.
December 16th essay is below.
![]() |
One of dozens of homes destroyed by the 2022 Andover, Kansas, Tornado |
If you missed yesterday's story about FEMA on Full Measure With Sharyl Attkisson, I encourage you to watch before reading further. You'll find the story here. It explains some of the many issues with FEMA's current operating model that -- literally -- have DEI and climate change ranking higher in FEMA's priorities than assisting disaster victims!
- The new mission of FEMA would be to serve as a facilitator to state and local governments in the wake of major (not routine) extreme weather and natural disasters (e.g., tsunami). The current "boots on the ground" model where FEMA often crowds out local responders simply doesn't work. This means a slimmer FEMA with staffed by emergency management and logistics experts with a high sense of urgency when disaster strikes. Keep in mind: no matter what, the local mayor, etc., will care more about the recovery of his city and region than people in Washington.
- With the above in mind, move FEMA's headquarters out of Washington -- NOW! Maybe put it in St. Louis. The hyper-political atmosphere of Washington doesn't do FEMA any good. In Washington, regardless of party, politics is always the #1 priority. Far outside of the Beltway, hopefully the official mission of FEMA will become the agency's first priority.
- DEI is poison and FEMA has no business worrying about climate change. FEMA's job is to carry out their mission in major disasters regardless of the cause(s). DEI and climate positions should be eliminated immediately as they distract the agency from focusing on what is important.
- FEMA should not be in the business of "creating greenways" and reorganizing communities. This causes a lot of friction. Local people should determine their post-disaster future. "But what about flood insurance continually rebuilding homes in flood plains?" which is a fair question. That should be worked out, in advance, in communities' disaster recovery plans, not by FEMA on the fly.
- The federal government and FEMA's actions have distorted the homeowner's insurance market. This needs to stop. The insured should get the benefit of their policies immediately, not chasing FEMA reps for $750 in short-term funds. If Congress needs to intervene, this is a rare time I will stay "okay." We need to be careful not to create counterproductive incentives. People who have faithfully paid their homeowners insurance premiums should be treated better than those who have "gone bare." It is not the job of the taxpayer to bail out beachfront mansion owners struck by hurricanes.
- With the above in mind, What do we do with people who have lost everything and chose not to carry insurance? This is a tough one. The best model I can think of is the Small Business Administration. The government could be a loan guarantor of last resort. The debt for these loans should not be dischargeable in bankruptcy court. There may be better ideas which certainly should be considered.
- After about the first ten days after a disaster, there is always a shortage of roofers, carpenters, contractors, et cetera. This because, in part, that these trades have state licenses. I propose that FEMA be authorized to create an interstate license authorizing the trades to work in a federally declared disaster area (only) for a fixed duration. A lot of the recovery momentum can be lost with blue tarps covering the community for months. A FEMA license will also assure victims the out-of-state contractor is not a scumbag.
Comments
Post a Comment