Global Warming Attacks: Answer to a Question
I just received a question about why I am not writing about the strongly pro-catastrophic global warming scientist who allegedly has a conflict-of-interest issue to the skeptical scientist who was under strong attack a week ago.
The answer is that I do not believe any scientist should be under personal attack for their scientific conclusions.
Science should be about the scientific method and the results derived therefrom.
Clear?
The answer is that I do not believe any scientist should be under personal attack for their scientific conclusions.
Science should be about the scientific method and the results derived therefrom.
Clear?
Comments
Post a Comment