"Shut Up, He Explained"
Just ahead of the release of the IPCC's report, Popular Science terminates comments on its articles. The editor tells us:
Comments can be bad for science. That's why, here at PopularScience.com, we're shutting them off.
Of course, that is the exact opposite of the scientific method.
"Scrutiny." "Scientists allow other community members to check their work." "Reviewing."
Seems like Popular Science doesn't understand what science is all about.
Comments can be bad for science. That's why, here at PopularScience.com, we're shutting them off.
Of course, that is the exact opposite of the scientific method.
The scientific community provides a system of checks and balances that ensures the quality of scientific work, double-checks arguments, and makes sure that ideas are evaluated fairly. This scrutiny can serve a few different functions — from fact-checking to whistleblowing: |
"Scrutiny." "Scientists allow other community members to check their work." "Reviewing."
Seems like Popular Science doesn't understand what science is all about.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteTry again... Popular Science is a legacy content provider struggling to deal with the reality of 21st century social media. They apparently also believe that investing in a moderating process does not provide value.
ReplyDeleteOr they are ready to jump wholeheartedly into Big Green's arms. :)