Thank You, Joplin

By -
Mindy and I had an enjoyable day in Joplin.

I can't seem to figure out how to embed the video, so if you would like to see KOAM TV's coverage, click here and if you would like to see KSNF's, it is here and here. Thanks to both Doug Heady and Gary Bandy for the interviews!

The city is gearing up for the one-year commemoration which is Tuesday. Mindy, I and the rest of the nation are cheering for Joplin's continued recovery from that horrible storm.

Comments

  1. BookwormMay 18, 2012 at 6:30 AM

    Mike: One of the issues the KSNF interviewer raised was one of perspective. He seems to think that the warning system, flawed though it was, still saved many MORE lives than it cost.

    I think he might have a point. In the absence of ANY warning system at all, as would have been the case prior to the 1950s, wouldn't the death toll have been much worse? While in the presence of a warning system that functioned perfectly or nearly so, the death toll might have been "only" in the double digits as you said.

    My guess is that with no warning at all the outcome would have been similar to Woodward, OK, in 1947, which lost 107 people out of a population at that time of about 5,400 (1940 census).

    If there were 50,000 residents in Joplin in 2011 that makes it almost 10 times the size of 1940s Woodward; and therefore the death toll could be expected to be almost 10 times as high... meaning roughly 900 to 1,000 people would have died in the COMPLETE absence of any warning!

    However, if the warning system had worked exactly "right" I'm thinking the death toll would have been more comparable to that of Tuscaloosa on April 27th, or OKC in 1999. About 50 people died in Tuscaloosa, which is a somewhat larger city of 80,000+; so I'm going to guess that about 35-40 would have died in Joplin even under a "perfect" warning system scenario. Does that make sense?

    Elaine

    ReplyDelete
  2. Mike SmithMay 18, 2012 at 6:45 AM

    Hi Elaine, I think your estimate of number of deaths in Joplin with a perfect warning is in the ballpark.

    One thing about the death toll in Tuscaloosa: The power had been out since morning in some parts of the town and some people could not get the warning because they had no TV and their cells phones didn't work (the cell towers' batteries had died). So, that might have inflated their death toll a bit which makes the contrast with Joplin's 161 even more stark.

    Almost the entire town of Woodward was destroyed whereas about 20% of Joplin suffered that fate. So, you can't scale Woodward upward to Joplin. I do not believe that 1,000 would have been killed without a warning in Joplin.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Roger V DavisMay 18, 2012 at 5:25 PM

    First, I don't think the interviewer liked you very much, Mike. This was one of the most "uncomfortable" interviews I've ever watched. He kept wringing his hands like he wanted to strangle you. I'd suggest staying away from that guy in the future, unless you have one or two other folks with you at the time...

    Anyway... the interviewer stated at one point that Joplin was never in a moderate or high risk of severe weather that day. That is not true. The SPC upgraded to a moderate risk (including a Public Severe Weather Outlook) with the 13z outlook that morning: http://www.spc.noaa.gov/exper/archive/event.php?date=20110522

    Furthermore, the area had already been placed within the "significant" tornado category as of the pre-dawn outlook issued just after Midnight that morning.

    So, to imply that the event was not FORECAST is inaccurate, in my opinion.

    I do completely agree that the WARNING portion of the process was a complete failure. Not so much with respect to the sirens (I regard them as old school technology and very ineffective, particularly when abused as they were for years prior in the Joplin area) but with respect to the completely botched method in which multiple warnings gave confusing, mixed signals in a very short, very important period of time.

    With the above said, I should probably point out that I have not yet read your book. I will be waiting for the iBook version - I have too many door stops around my house as it is (not to imply that your latest effort will fall into that category, but I think you get my drift).

    ReplyDelete
  4. Mike SmithMay 19, 2012 at 12:53 AM

    Hi Roger. The tornado is still a raw memory to many.

    The Kindle version was uploaded about 12 hr. ago and I hope it will be available later today (Sat.).

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The East Coast Severe Weather Threat is Over

By -
Image
Midnight: The East Coast Threat for Tornadoes and Severe  Thunderstorms Has Ended 3:50pm. Tornado watch for the Middle Atlantic Region. 2:30pm Tornadoes are also forecast in the South. 2:20pm. A couple of tornadoes, hail and wind gusts to 65 mph are possible with these storms. This includes NYC and Philadelphia.  1:05pm. The tornado risk has been extended northward into New York. The brown area has a significant risk of tornadoes. Remember: if a tornado warning is issued, go to your basement and get under heavy furniture like a pool table. Of, if your basement is finished, get into the bathroom. Go ahead an put a couple of water bottles and, if appropriate, diapers in your shelter area. Wear shoes.  If you don't have a basement or safe room, go to the lowest floor and get into a bath or closet in the middle of your home. Children should be put in the bathtub.  I'll update later today. 
Read more

Today's Tornado and Severe Thunderstorm Outlook - 9:30pm

By -
Image
After 65 mph winds went through Wichita, we have been without power for 35 minutes. So, I am going to have to end coverage for the night (using backup systems to write this). Scroll down for the forecast of tornadoes and severe thunderstorms for Sunday and Sunday night.  Please read down for the latest forecasts regarding this dangerous tornado and damaging wind situation! 5:40pm, a new "regular" tornado watch has been issued for north central Kansas.  Note that wind gusts to 80 mph are likely in this storm in addition to tornadoes and giant hail. Please make sure friends and relatives in the area are aware of the danger in the area outlined in red below plus the red area outlined at 2:50pm  In addition to "several strong tornadoes," hail to 4.8" in diameter is forecast along with wind gusts to 80 mph. Now is the time for persons living in mobile homes, manufactured homes and those with mobility issues should be making plans!!  Do not wait until a tornado warn...
Read more

Updated Freezing Rain and Heavy Rain Forecast

By -
Image
Note: An Updated Forecast is Available HERE Freezing Rain The National Weather Service has now issued winter weather advisories, two warnings and a watch. It may be a bit too large but, when it comes to freezing rain and slick roads, caution is usually the better course of action.  Here's a color code: Deep purple is an ice storm warning; serious condition where power outages are possible. Pink is a winter storm warning for significant icing. Deep green is a winter storm watch. I don't know why this is still a watch. If I were on the forecast desk I would have a winter storm warning for icing.  Dark blue is a winter weather advisory, a lesser condition, for icing.  Here is a view of the entire watch/warning/advisory area. The small area of green in Illinois is for flooding and, in Nebraska, for snow.  Here is a forecast of freezing rain amounts; totals to 6am Tuesday.  Color codes: Yellow is 0.25 to 0.50 inches. Power outages may occur in this areas. Deep blue i...
Read more