Why Would You Trust Scientists That Cannot Read a Graph?
Britain's Hadley Center's (PRO-global warming group) world temperatures for the last twenty years. There has been no warming since 1998. |
If you want to watch a one hour debate over global warming, it is here:
(I watched the debate so you don't have to)
Lord Monckton is the former science advisor to Margaret Thatcher and has published one global warming paper in a peer-reviewed scientific journal.
Most tellingly, Mr. Dennis tells us, over and over, global warming "is occurring" (present tense). As I keep pointing out, temperatures have not warmed in over a decade. The graph proving that is at the top of the post.
Mr. Dennis challenges us to "trust" climate science. Exit question: Why would you trust scientists that cannot read a simple temperature graph?
Apparently the judges, all journalists, agree with me. The judge's score: Monckton (anti-global warming) 10 and Dennis 1.
No wonder Al Gore will not debate the issue!
Of course, a debate doesn't prove anything. But, as we know, the media (which judged the debate) is hardly skeptical about global warming yet they overwhelming judged anti-global warming as the winning side.
Amazing what happens to people when they are exposed to both sides of the issue.
Comments
Post a Comment